i myself have always tried to ponder deeply about our immediate future, you however have the most unique way of presenting a vision, almost as if you’ve been there

Just stopping by your website (it’s great) to say hello! I think the Venus Project is great because it informs rather than complains – we have the resources and the technology, let’s use it the right way. The Venus Project it’s a great inspiration for me and I believe for others. Incredible designs!

Keep up the good work, I’ll be subscribing to your blog.

Hi there,

I am very much in favor of what you are doing, you must have read the Technocracy Study Course. I am 44 years old and an active member of Technocracy inc. I’m curious as to why you have not mentioned the word Technocracy, or the names Howard Scott, M. King Hubbert, Charles Steinmetz, Thorstein Veblen, or any of the orginal members of the Technical Alliance who conducted the original energy survey of North America. You say you don’t have “credentials” and no one really listens, but these people had the credentials. They were some of the brightest balbs on the tree, why do you choose not to acknowledge the source of your information. It’s obvious to me, Jacque, that you got your information from them. Thanks for caring.

Robert

We watched one of your interviews yesterday on you-tube, It sounded as though you were reading right from the Technocracy Study Course. In one of your short films you talked about how you were not being taken seriously because you lacked the “credentials”, my question to you is why didn’t you make reference to M. King Hubbert, Howard Scott, Charles Steinmetz, Thorstein Veblen, Nikola Tesla and all those who conducted the Energy Survey of North America way back in the early part of the 20th century? They are the ones who gave you the source information for your Venus Project. They were known as the Technical Alliance. And yes, they indeed had credentials, in fact they were the leaders in their specific fields of interest. It can only help you by talking about the orgins of the Venus Project, let the people know that the information that you are giving them is about 80 years old, wow, can you believe it? They are still way ahead of their time. Keep up the great work, you are right on the money.

im only a 16 year old kid but i believe in the venus project and i hope when im an adult that this project will be in effect and help our planet…

The zeitgeist movie reveals those thruths which will not permit the venus project to be possible before a long time, especially in america where a selfish individualistic capitalist short term view and where privatisations lobbeying and speculative bankers are the masters of economy and wars,—-For the Venus project COULD BE POSSIBLE ONLY in a cooperative socialist mode where land would not be privatized but owned by the housing agricultural or municipal communities and coops without addictions to religion, drug, crime or war (including in cinemas and games) so hope for the best folks

Plus—Dubai would have been a good place to experiment the construction of a venus type city, as they had the money and the means to do it but too late now—-The philosophy of the zeitgeistmovement and venusproject have some resemblance with the prout.org movement in India, have a look on their interesting site also, Have a nice day folks.

Cars and houses in the project have some features found in the Bucky Fuller,s dimaxion house and car—-A honest resourses based banking system was proposed to the British and Canadian governments years ago called Social Credit by CLIFFORD HUGH DOUGLAS and of course was rejected to favor the private banks actual fraudulous lobbeying and speculative system.

See the free Moneymasters video confirming the zeitgeist addendum revelations about actual banks.

The USSR had a basically very good social and banking system (especially in the Khruchev era)before the party leaders started to sit on and profit from the advantages of their positions. Stalin was a dictator (especially in war time) but not Lenin, Marx (first name Karl, not Groucho)was right in most of his philosophy in his books The Capital and the Manifesto. The USSR destruction started (hopefully without war )first when a KGB agent revealed most military secrets to a French agent and later when a Reagan economic consultant (anti-soviet fanatic)discovered how their system was financed. Russia owned five small private banks in western europe, and their main exportation revenue was from oil, the Reagan team blocked the currency transfers between the five banks and made an association with the Saudis to maintain oil at an all time low price for about two years turning the USSR bankrupt. Later sent their agent G.Sorros to finnish the destruction of the economy with massive privatisations with Gaidar and Chubais, devalue the local currency, corrupt the local industries leaders which are now the Oligarch and start the entrance of American multinationals. Putin stopped this destruction evinced Sorros and saved what was left by sending Kodorkovsky to jail preventing him from selling shares of Lukos to American Oil companies and scaring the other Oligarchs. Soljeyistin said that the privatizations of the land was the greatest fraud and crime of humanity.

The Capitalist system was very good in the 30 glorious years of the JohnMeynard KEYNES (British economist) era, because working on basically honest grounds, and competing advantagously with the soviet system, today is very different as fraud is legalized openly permitting lobbeying and speculation even by the banks themselves and permitting easily all kinds of abuses (Madoff style). The economic Bases are no more Production versus Consumption (offer vs demand), but unproductive casino type economy for short time view, quick profits in lobbeying with stock market speculation (offer and demand but on shares). More, a bank cannot go bankrupt in banking business only, but in speculation shure can in stupid careless mistakes , now the governments put them back in business with the tax money of its citizens, a few years ago was simply bought by a competitor.

There can be no Communism without Totalitarism and no Socialism without SOLIDARITY———–Law of Sarkar on social cycles, alternately in power—The Intellectuals–The Laborers–The Military–The Accumulators.NO LAW can correct the actual economic situation, the Sarbanes-Oxley was tried and the more effective Glass-Steagall Act which was later abolished.Only Social Credit(the Clifford Hugh Douglass way) could stop it or the Tobin tax slow it.

Adam Smith started the actual mess with his Invisible Hand of the market, and amplified later by the Chicago boys, Milton Freidman, FredericVon Hayec and some other so called economists renaming it as a science.