Comments on: Future By Design Screening In California

By: wzupy

wzupy — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:48:39 +0000

the work to progres ,discover and invent new things that brings joy to people is many times increased(in the venus project) . Majority of people today do not work because it brings joy, they work for money to buy things that brings them joy,the things they wanted to buy will be free and then they can work,study,discover on what they bring them joy(working in a restaurant is only bringing money not joy and that job will be replaced by machines) . Few people in this days can work for money and joy to invent,study and discover things. @James S Saint

By: wzupy

wzupy — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:35:19 +0000

dont know about this movie but I`m sure all money the venus project can make will be used to help this project @Kevin

By: wzupy

wzupy — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:32:50 +0000

Andrei if you see this message please contact me at cs.wzup@yahoo.com(si pe mess) …@Andrei

By: wzupy

wzupy — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:30:06 +0000

those are small problems that can be easily solved... The most important now is transation@William Nelson

By: wzupy

wzupy — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:22:35 +0000

this is possible beacause we have resources and knowledge, that is all we need (but in this system + money).The farmer will have the posibility to educate himself if he wants to ... @jay

By: Hayai

Hayai — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:49:42 +0000

So Jay, with your logic nowadays the farmer should have more economical resources (money) than a lawyer from a big enterprise with all the comoditys that represent. Not happening, not gonna happen happen ever. For the farmer to be equal to a lawyer is an improvement right now.
Not saying that your suppose venus project assumption is right.

By: Conte Senza Palazzo

Conte Senza Palazzo — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:42:32 +0000

Sorry for being OT. Creative, visionary: possible. You are absolutely brilliant! I am a new fan from Italy and I am spreading the word about Venus Project over here. Grazie!

By: Simon Royl

Simon Royl — Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:33:16 +0000

I notice that the twitter account and this blog as well as any other updates all seem to cease around June 2009. Has something happened?

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:18:41 +0000

Let`s say that this project is running right now and every person has its basic needs covered (food, home, education, health…) what if all people would like to own their own car, yacht, jet, beach house, what if each memeber of the family would like to have each one all of this things would be there enough resources? What if everybody wants to have bigger houses because with swiming pools in their privacy at home. What would happen with all needs of a person? Who will creat & control my needs as a person. What would happend if for example in this resource based society the offer of high quality car (or any other product) are not what my or some other person expectation are. What would happend than. I think that on the long run the choice or the freedom would be in jeopardy and this is why I also thik this would be an utpoia society. This society would only be possible when all of us humans beings leave aside all of our personal & individual needs, desire, dreams in the name of the common good, and to me this just sounds as disguised communism.

By: Colin Smith

Colin Smith — Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:05:11 +0000

For anyone who saw Zeitgeist the essence of the Venus Project can be found in the works of George Bernard Shaw, who foresaw the need for this, and drew it in greater detail than I find in anything put out by the Project in his “Intelligent Woman’s guide to Socialism, Communism, etc”. Shaw was a true pioneer, and his Fabian Socialism and equality of income point the way. He answers in detail many of the questions found on this web page. I see no need for the emphasis on science. Nor do we need all the futuristic images I see in the art-work on this web site. Humankind will continue to enjoy the natural beauty of the world, as it has done since the beginning of human occupation of this planet. If the better world envisaged by the Project is so far into the future that technology will make the environment unrecognizable to us, it will be hard to work towards. Finally, I was alarmed to see more of the 9/11 false flag nonsense served up in the film. There is no evidence to support the proposition that it was a false flag episode, and if the Institute identifies with this position then you have lost me.